The Pacific Coast of British Columbia, in particular the lower mainland, is the riskiest market in Canada to invest in housing.
Price risk is systemic in the market, with unpredictable short term, real price increases always followed by long term (more than 8 years), real price declines, or, at best, nominal increases. For example, after more than a 100% increase in prices from 1979-1981, real prices dropped so much and for so long that they needed until 2002 - 2004 to surpass the 1981 high. A 1995 buyer did not see a real price increase until 2005. Price disclosure is clouded by the fact the local real estate board regularly issues inconsistent reports. For instance, in July this year, the Vancouver board reported locally that prices in Vancouver were up about 5% year-after-year but reported a different set of numbers to national real estate association which showed a 1% year-after-year decline.
Construction risk in this market is the highest in Canada. The leaky condo crisis of the late 1990s resulted in the collapse of the BC New Home Warranty Program, something unparalleled in Canada. While the crisis may seem to be over, many condos/strata still do not comply with rainscreen standards. The costs to buyers of resale condos/strata can range from $30M to $200M in repairs. We consider legislative requirements for reserve funds to be inadequate given the risk. Building code and municipal by-laws/standards are weak compared to Ontario and Quebec standards. For instance, owners of wood framed condos/strata are not prohibited from having propane equipment on their exterior decks, with the result that wood frame buildings suffer extreme damage from source-localized fires. Sprinkler systems are required, but we are well aware that sprinkler systems reduce insurance claims for infrastructure rebuilding but have no virtually impact on individual owner, non-structural property replacement such as furniture.
This risky market is now in decline. A plummet would be best how to describe it. Sales are off almost 50% year-over-year in Vancouver. Prices are down, drastically in some cases, but price declines are difficult to track because of the way prices are reported.
In many local areas, prices have no-where to go but down, and far down. There are some condos in signature buildings, such as the Shangri-La and Ritz Carlton, listing from $12-29 million. We have seen such condos, in other markets, marked down by 60-70% in order to sell them. And we have watched near identical projects, such as the proposed Toronto Ritz Carlton, fail. In addition, the business model of mixed use condo/hotel/commercial buildings is fraught with problems (Tower 3 of the Peninsula development in Puerto Vallarta, and 1 King West in Toronto are examples) and seldom meet cash flow projections. The Coal Harbour area of Vancouver boasts an average price of over $800M for condos. These condos rent for $2,000 to $4,000 per month, which means that on a cash flow basis, they are worth between $240M to $480M depending on assumed interest rates.
How bad will it get here. We projected a 25% decline in price in this market. We now consider that number to be very conservative. We are now projecting a 25-30% decline in prices depending on neighborhood and property type. Single family homes in good locations such as West Vancouver and North Vancouver are best protected from price declines. Expensive, large-square-foot, cookie-cutter, high rise condos in such areas as Yaletown and Coal Harbour, or in suburban locations, are at the greatest risk of 30%+ price declines.
In case these projections seem pessimistic we can provide the following proven historical price declines from other markets:
Hong Kong real estate 1997-2001 - down 60% in price
Toronto real estate April, 1989 - October, 1996 - down 35%
Panama City, Florida Condo prices April 2006 - April, 2008 - down 33%
Mt. Tremblant real estate April 2003 - August 2008 - down 25%
Any recommendations we make depend on a buyer/investor's individual circumstances. However, we do recommend that anyone considering selling in this market in the next 4 years, do so now. We would be hesitant to issue any buy recommendations, again dependent on specific circumstances and objectives.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment